Dear Friends,

Would any DFA groups, Democratic Clubs, County DCCs and/or their Chairs, CDP Delegates and/or CDP eBoard Members like to sign on as a supporter for this Resolution by the CDP Rural Caucus Leadership? See below. Thank you!

Susan Rowe
South Central Vice Chair, CDP Rural Caucus
Chair, Madera County Democratic Party

Resolution to Support Payment of PILT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) Funds to 36 Counties

Whereas, the state of California through the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) has purchased private land for the establishment of wildlife management areas and for environmental purposes effectively removing it from the county property tax rolls in these 36 counties:

Alpine, Butte, Colusa, Del Norte, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Marin, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo; and Yuba; and

Whereas, from 1957 through 2002 the state of California compensated counties for the loss of property taxes due to the establishment of wildlife management areas, however DFW did not make PILT fund payments to counties from 2002 to 2015 due to the failure of the legislature to appropriate funds for this purpose and as a result the counties have suffered economic hardship in the form of the elimination of funding for such programs, including, but not limited to; public safety, fire prevention and fire fighting, social programs for homeless, including veterans, families with children, mental health programs including domestic violence, drug/alcohol addiction and more.

Whereas, 2015-16 the Legislature appropriated $8 million in funding to pay the arrearages, however the 2015-16 the final State Budget Package eliminated the $8 million in arrearages that has been required for 45 years under F&G 1504 and in addition made the PILT payments “permissive” rather than required.

Now, therefore be it resolved, that the Rural Caucus of the California Democratic Party supports repayment in full of the arrearages owed to the 36 affected counties by the appropriation of $8 million to the DFW.

Be it further resolved, the Caucus respectfully requests that the great State of California keep its promises to 36 of its 58 counties and again require these ongoing payments.

Adopted by the California Democratic Party Rural Caucus on February 26, 2016.

__________________________ Attest:  _______________________

Jamie Beutler, Chair Becky Curry, Secretary

Section 1504.  Amended in October 2015. – Amendments in bold.

(a) When income is derived directly from real property acquired and operated by the state as a wildlife management area, and regardless of whether income is derived from property acquired after October 1, 1949, the department may pay annually to the county in which the property is located an amount equal to the county taxes levied upon the property at the time title to the property was transferred to the state. The department may also pay the assessments levied upon the property by any irrigation, drainage, or reclamation district.

(b) Any delinquent penalties or interest applicable to any of those assessments made before September 9, 1953, are hereby canceled and shall be waived.

(c) Payments provided by this section shall only be made from funds that are appropriated to the department for the purposes of this section.

(d) As used in this section, the term “wildlife management area” includes waterfowl management areas, deer ranges, upland game bird management areas, and public shooting grounds.

(e) Any payment made under this section shall be made on or before December 10 of each year, with the exception of newly acquired property for which payments shall be made pursuant to subdivision (f).

(f) Any payments made for the purposes of this section shall be made within one year of the date title to the property was transferred to the state, or within 90 days from the date of designation as a wildlife management area, whichever occurs first, prorated for the balance of the year from the date of designation as a wildlife management area to the 30th day of June following the date of designation as a wildlife management area, and, thereafter, payments shall be made on or before December 10 of each year.

(g) Notwithstanding any other law, payments provided under this section shall not be allocated to a school district, a community college district, or a county superintendent of schools.



Our first order of business was to vote for our endorsements for Senate District 9 and the Contra Costa County Democratic Party Central Committee (CCCDPCC).  Our treasurer, Greg Lyman, took advantage of the large number of members who came to vote to verify as many phone numbers, snail and email addresses as possible. Each member receiving a ballot initialed the membership list to assure that only fully eligible members received ballots.

Nancy Skinner and Gabriel Quinto were the only two candidates to receive over 60% of the votes; they received our endorsement for Senate District 9 and CCCDPCC respectively.  

Full results were as follows:

59 ballots
59 votes in SD9:
Nancy Skinner 37
Sandre Swanson 19
Katherine Welch 3

233 votes in Central Committee:
Maria Alegria 29
Nicholas Arzio 30
Genoveva Calloway 25
Michael Nye 22
Mister Phillips 33
Gabriel Quinto 38
Harpreet Sandhu 29
Joey Smith 27

36 votes were required to have 60% of the vote. DC members Nicholas Arzio and Russell Skeahan challenged the outcome; the results were verified by an independent party on Saturday, April 30.  See CHALLENGE TO APRIL 26 ENDORSEMENT MEETING BALLOTING.

Hilary Crosby
ECDC President


Come Celebrate Loving Day, El Cerrito Style!

Sunday June 12, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
City Hall Civic Plaza, Manila Avenue

Let’s celebrate Loving Day on June 12th at El Cerrito City Hall.  Loving Day in El Cerrito is a celebration of racial equality, marriage equality and human equality.  

Loving Day was started by a graduate student named Ken Tanabe.  He had been studying the Supreme Court Case of Mildred and Richard Loving.  Richard Loving was a Caucasian man and Mildred was an African American woman.  Their marriage was illegal in Virginia and they were forced to leave their home after being arrested.  The Lovings and their children relocated to Washington DC where they took their case to the Supreme Court and won, unanimously.

Loving Day has become a celebration of multiculturalism and is an opportunity to learn from the past while coming together to create a future of tolerance and understanding through dialogue and education.  It is also noteworthy that it was the Loving case that was used as precedent to legalize Gay Marriage.

Join us on June 12th for this family friendly event! We will have music, crafts, photo booth fun, a reading corner, chalk art, food trucks and more! 

Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto RN
ECDC Member

(Please contact Hilary Crosby – – if you want to help staff the ECDC booth at this event.)