We have received confirmation from Bharat Trehan, PhD, that he will also present at our May meeting. Dr. Trehan retired from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco two years ago, and has since been active with the ACLU. His focus has been on surveillance. In his presentation, he will discuss the use of drones and other surveillance devices, who should decide on whether or not to use such devices, and how they should be deployed.
Vote on standing rules addition (see http://ecdclub.org/?p=1208)
Resolution on Payment in Lieu of Taxes (see http://ecdclub.org/?p=1223)
Our main topic for May is the militarization of local police departments. Mimi Bull, retired from the legal division of CA Dept of Social Services and a member of our local ACLU of Northern California Chapter, will be joined by one or two of her fellow chapter members, including Antonio Medrano who is also an ECDC member, a retired teacher, and a past member of the West Contra Costa County Unified School Board. We look forward to a lively discussion!
Would any DFA groups, Democratic Clubs, County DCCs and/or their Chairs, CDP Delegates and/or CDP eBoard Members like to sign on as a supporter for this Resolution by the CDP Rural Caucus Leadership? See below. Thank you!
South Central Vice Chair, CDP Rural Caucus
Chair, Madera County Democratic Party
Resolution to Support Payment of PILT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) Funds to 36 Counties
Whereas, the state of California through the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) has purchased private land for the establishment of wildlife management areas and for environmental purposes effectively removing it from the county property tax rolls in these 36 counties:
Alpine, Butte, Colusa, Del Norte, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Marin, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo; and Yuba; and
Whereas, from 1957 through 2002 the state of California compensated counties for the loss of property taxes due to the establishment of wildlife management areas, however DFW did not make PILT fund payments to counties from 2002 to 2015 due to the failure of the legislature to appropriate funds for this purpose and as a result the counties have suffered economic hardship in the form of the elimination of funding for such programs, including, but not limited to; public safety, fire prevention and fire fighting, social programs for homeless, including veterans, families with children, mental health programs including domestic violence, drug/alcohol addiction and more.
Whereas, 2015-16 the Legislature appropriated $8 million in funding to pay the arrearages, however the 2015-16 the final State Budget Package eliminated the $8 million in arrearages that has been required for 45 years under F&G 1504 and in addition made the PILT payments “permissive” rather than required.
Now, therefore be it resolved, that the Rural Caucus of the California Democratic Party supports repayment in full of the arrearages owed to the 36 affected counties by the appropriation of $8 million to the DFW.
Be it further resolved, the Caucus respectfully requests that the great State of California keep its promises to 36 of its 58 counties and again require these ongoing payments.
Adopted by the California Democratic Party Rural Caucus on February 26, 2016.
__________________________ Attest: _______________________
Jamie Beutler, Chair Becky Curry, Secretary
Section 1504. Amended in October 2015. – Amendments in bold.
(a) When income is derived directly from real property acquired and operated by the state as a wildlife management area, and regardless of whether income is derived from property acquired after October 1, 1949, the department may pay annually to the county in which the property is located an amount equal to the county taxes levied upon the property at the time title to the property was transferred to the state. The department may also pay the assessments levied upon the property by any irrigation, drainage, or reclamation district.
(b) Any delinquent penalties or interest applicable to any of those assessments made before September 9, 1953, are hereby canceled and shall be waived.
(c) Payments provided by this section shall only be made from funds that are appropriated to the department for the purposes of this section.
(d) As used in this section, the term “wildlife management area” includes waterfowl management areas, deer ranges, upland game bird management areas, and public shooting grounds.
(e) Any payment made under this section shall be made on or before December 10 of each year, with the exception of newly acquired property for which payments shall be made pursuant to subdivision (f).
(f) Any payments made for the purposes of this section shall be made within one year of the date title to the property was transferred to the state, or within 90 days from the date of designation as a wildlife management area, whichever occurs first, prorated for the balance of the year from the date of designation as a wildlife management area to the 30th day of June following the date of designation as a wildlife management area, and, thereafter, payments shall be made on or before December 10 of each year.
(g) Notwithstanding any other law, payments provided under this section shall not be allocated to a school district, a community college district, or a county superintendent of schools.