IT’S TIME TO REBUILD — WHY WE NEED THE BART SYSTEM RENEWAL BOND

By Taylor Huckaby, BART Spokesperson
(Contributed by BART Legislative Officer Paul Fadelli)

Since 1972, billions of trips have been taken on BART.  Our trains and stations are central to Bay Area culture, knitting together friends, family, businesses, employees, landmarks, and opportunities.  When we first opened, BART was the envy of the world – the first to use computer-controlled trains.

However, what was cutting edge in 1972 no longer serves the complex needs of our region.  Growth has been a bittersweet experience for everyone – and BART has not been spared from either the pressures of population change or the passage of time.  We fit right into the middle of many of the most pressing questions of our day, on every issue from traffic, to housing, to environmental concerns.

We are now serving 430,000 passengers on an average weekday, the equivalent of the population of Atlanta, and facilitate tens of millions of dollars in daily economic productivity.  The commute – which, frankly, is no fun no matter what the method – has become intolerable for residents, many of whom find themselves so closely squeezed together they can reasonably guess the type of shampoo their neighbors use.  Stations and signage are dated and worn, and at times our platforms can be uncomfortable and crowded.

Yet there is a silver lining to these growing pains, as greater demand for public transit is, generally speaking, a good problem for cities to have. As we have aged, the vibrancy of this community and the quality of the Bay Area’s workforce has soothed the most pressing needs of our aching system.   An army of BART engineers, welders, machinists, electronic technicians, mechanics and system workers have extended the life of our train cars and physical infrastructure in extraordinary ways, working ever harder to offset ever-increasing stresses.

Additionally, record ridership has enabled us to find the funding for many of the solutions needed to bring us into the 21st century, funding for which we are truly grateful.  This year alone we have hired more groundskeepers, more system maintenance workers, and more mechanics. We are building a new maintenance complex to ensure the downtime between car breakdowns stays at a minimum. We are modernizing our stations. And to top everything off, our new, larger fleet of train cars is right on the horizon – the first of which arrived in March.

However, there is a massive, looming problem that must be addressed separately from the work we’ve already been doing to improve.  The bones of BART, all the miles of power transmission cabling, rails, tunnels, and track components working quietly in the background, are decaying.  BART’s core was not built to last much further where we are now, and the cost of repairing and replacing what we have with what we need exceeds whatever monetary gains have come from increased ridership. Just our power replacement requirements alone over the next decade have a price tag of $1.2 billion.

To use an analogy: when building a home, every homeowner must choose a roof, and that roof has a specific lifespan.  You can afford to patch here and there over the years and fix minor damage from weather, but eventually the whole roof must be replaced at great cost.  That’s where we are, and that’s what we mean when we say much of the system is at the end of its useful life.

Part of BART’s plan to rebuild is a $3.5 billion general obligation bond measure, proposed to go before voters in Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco voters this November.  The measure is a no-frills package based on hard data—collected using international best practices and a strong internal accountability program (asset management software) which gives us the exact life span for all the tens of thousands of different physical parts of BART.

This is about replacing 90 miles of worn rail, waterproofing our leaky tunnels below sea level in downtown San Francisco, modernizing the physical parts of our train control system, fighting fault line creep. This isn’t about pet projects, and we’ve been sensitive to the needs of our community. To that end, we’ve held over 200 meetings with diverse groups throughout the Bay Area to give our plan context, and to get an idea of how we can improve the lives of the people we serve.

At these meetings have been elected officials, businesses, labor groups, environmental organizations, seniors, disability advocacy groups, community organizers, social justice advocates, and individuals—and BART remains committed to having an open conversation about our future. We are here to listen and engage.

Since the last earthquake protection bond measure in 2004, we’ve proven ourselves to be a responsible and trustworthy steward of public funds. We’ve reinforced parking garages, strengthened maintenance facilities, fortified stations, and protected the Transbay Tube—guarding our riders against the threat of earthquakes while building trust and saving millions of dollars.

Furthermore, if the bond measure passes, part of BART’s plan is to establish an Independent Oversight Committee to ensure your capital investments are carried out with an excess of transparency, accountability, and integrity. The Committee will be able to regularly audit BART, and will publish an annual, public, independent report outlining any concerns that could arise from how we carry out our rebuilding efforts.

Back in 1962, the Bay Area led the world in deciding to invest in its future – a future of safe travel, reliable transit, and reduced congestion.  Ever since then, we have been a proud and enduring staple of this region’s culture, its workforce, and its values.  It’s time to rebuild.

CHALLENGE TO APRIL 26 ENDORSEMENT MEETING BALLOTING

On Tuesday, April 26, 59 members of the El Cerrito Democratic Club voted decisively (37 to 19 to 3) to endorse Nancy Skinner for Senate District 9, giving her 62% of the votes cast over Sandre Swanson and Katherine Welch, respectively.  At the same time, Gabriel Quinto received 64% of the vote for Contra Costa County Democratic Central Committee (CCCDCC).  Both Skinner and Quinto, receiving votes over a required 60% threshold, have the Club’s endorsement.

Two days after the April meeting, a club member who had not received the Club’s endorsement for his candidacy for election to the CCCDCC asked to inspect the ballots; he and a friend challenged the endorsement process, presenting evidence that in addition to the 59 ballots cast and tallied, a 60th ballot of uncertain origin had been included in the final tally.

Naturally, this was of grave concern, even though the margin of victory for both Nancy Skinner and Gabriel Quinto was large enough that the outcome would not change because of a single vote.  “The integrity of our endorsement process was challenged.” said Greg Lyman, ECDC Treasurer.  “Our endorsement is the most valuable contribution our club makes to the West County; we can not put it at risk.”

Although Club President Hilary Crosby believed the results of the voting were decisive enough to move forward without re-examining the ballots, she arranged for an independent agent to review all the materials and verify the results of the endorsement vote.  Crosby said, “I am grateful to Joan Carpenter, and Mary Nicely; they both used their personal time to help us secure an accessible venue, inspected and recounted the ballots, and confirmed the results.  I knew our process had been exemplary, especially for an all volunteer organization, but I realized that we needed help from our members and our larger community to confirm that our process was fair.”

The two endorsement proceedings reviewed involved 11 candidates; three candidates for the Senate District 9 office currently held by Sen. Loni Hancock, and 8 candidates for 5 seats on the CCCDCC.   The single disputed ballot did not reduce Skinner’s percentage of the votes enough to change the endorsement; the challenger added a second complaint on Saturday – that the ballots didn’t include a line for “no endorsement”, a choice allowed in the standing rules. The independent election reviewer deemed this secondary complaint irrelevant.  All the ballots distributed had been returned by the members, and that oversight had been addressed immediately prior to the voting with an announcement informing members to write that choice if they wished.

The Club revamped its endorsement rules in late 2015, but there were no policies, procedures or rules in place to respond to a challenge after the voting had taken place.  This incident revealed where improvements are still needed; additions and modifications to the standing rules for endorsement will be presented at the May meeting.

“I have seen votes contested on site,” Carla Hansen, Immediate Past President said.  “I’m glad that our process was consistent and careful enough to be sustained even days later.

“We were willing to act quickly and resolutely to demonstrate that our process could withstand intense scrutiny. ” asserted President Crosby  “When all the votes are counted, we believe in working together to elect strong, progressive candidates, and hold them accountable to our platform is the best way to create positive change.  That’s our mission, and we’re sticking to it.”

The ECDC has always been a voice for progressive Democrats, opposing the war in Vietnam when President Johnson was in office, and more recently supporting single payer health care and opposing the death penalty before the Democratic National Committee or the California Democratic Party.  During those decades, the ECDC has held regular monthly meetings with presenters on a wide range of topics, published a monthly newsletter, hosted an annual dinner, and voted to endorse candidates and ballot measures. Their stated reason for being is a responsibility to the Democrats of West Contra Costa County.

“As a Democrat, I have come to rely on the ECDC to provide interesting content and well researched endorsements,” said Peter Chau. “I am happy with the final outcome of the endorsement election, which did not change as a result of the recount. Tuesday’s main program presentation was inspiring and offered important ideas about electoral organizing.”

MORE ON THE MARCH MEETING – ANNOUNCEMENTS

As well as the excellent presentation on Measure AA by our County Supervisor John GIoia, several of our members provided information about upcoming events, and our Vice President of Membership Igor Tregub presented legislation sponsored by our Assemblymember Tony Thurmond and our State Senator Loni Hancock.

Jonee Grassi announced the May 16 lobbying day for healthcare as announced elsewhere in the newsletter.

Al Miller announced the April 2 candidates’ roundup for SD 9 presented by the NAACP.

Rita Xavier is a Member of Senior Legislators working on senior related legislation.  Unfortunately, this group may be disbanded due to lack of funding.  It’s funded through a check box on tax return.  

Gabe Quinto announced the Contra Costa Democratic Central Committee Third Annual Roosevelt Dinner on April 23 at the Concord Crowne Plaza Hotel.  Our own Hilary Crosby will receive the Volunteer of the Year Award, and several other luminaries will receive awards.  See complete information at http://www.contracostadems.org/rad2016

Kiev Smith announced a disco dance party Fundraiser for Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Igor Tregub discussed the Young Dems Convention and its endorsement of Kamala Harris.

Betty Brown announced a reading in 17 parts of Martin Luther King’s Beyond Vietnam speech, by a coalition of antiwar groups, on April 5 at Oakland’s Frank Ogawa Plaza.

Paul Fadelli delivered several pieces of information about ongoing security at BART, the track closure, and the collaboration between BART and the Arts Commission plans for the Del Norte Station.

Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto informed us that the El Cerrito Human Rights Commission is working on ways to address the recent hate Crime in El Cerrito, and that the NAACP Chapter has a subcommittee to move to respond to this as well.  

Igor Tregub presented information on the following legislation which our club then voted unanimously to support:

Assemblymember Tony Thurmond’s bills ABX 2-9; AB2406; AB 2756; AB 2824 and Senator Loni Hancock’s Senate bills SB 1277; SB 1278; SB 1279; SB 1280 which were more fully described in our March, 2016 newsletter article which you can read at http://ecdclub.dev.haveabyte.com/?p=1161.