September Meeting Recap

by Hilary Crosby

Our September meeting had a focus local – our main presenter was our District 1 Supervisor John Gioia. One guest, Brady Calma, was from Local 21 of the International Professional and Technical Engineers which represents their members in Contra Costa County. Our other guest was Zachery Mallet, the BART board member for part of El Cerrito and the rest of West Contra Costa County.

Brady came to inform us about a dispute over changes in how increases in the cost of healthcare premiums will be shared between the county and its employees. Up until 2009, the county paid a percentage of the increases in health care premiums, but since then, the employees have paid 100% of the premium increases.

wBART
BART Director Zakhary Mallett made a brief presentation about his proposal to explore expanded rail service that may connect northern communities in West Contra Costa County with existing BART services at the Richmond or El Cerrito del Norte BART Station, a project he calls wBART. By relating wBART to eBART in East Contra Costa County, he discussed wBART being neither alignment‐ nor technology‐specific, but an open‐ended study and project title that would identify which alignment and which technology would best serve the purpose of providing a commuting alternative to the many commuters in the area.

As he reminded us, this issue was an important reason for why he wanted to serve on the BART board, and it was refreshing to hear an elected official follow up on a campaign promise. At this point, Mr. Mallett is still working to build political consensus to conduct the comprehensive study component of this effort and is hoping to secure funds for such a study.

Mr. Mallett pointed out that the I‐80 corridor is the most congested commute corridor in the San Francisco Bay Area and suggested this as a paramount reason for investing in the wBART study. Since traffic congestion contributes to global warming, chances are our club would support the wBART effort.

In response to questions from Sandy Waters, an ECDC member who has recently retired from her position as BART station agent, Mr. Mallett informed us that an initial planning study would probably cost between $400,000 and $600,000 and that the Environmental Review process would likely run between $2 million and $2.5 million. This of course begs the question of the amount it would cost to actually construct the project.

Supervisor Gioia put this issue into the broader county‐wide, and pointed out that the main reason county didn’t fund the extension because would have sucked up all other transportation money. There is currently no identified funding for wBART, and building BART is really really expensive.

Supervisor Gioia provided the Club with various updates on Healthcare, the County’s financial situation and overall good news for residents in Contra Costa.

Healthcare
Contra Costa County (CCC) has been a leader in providing healthcare for 30‐40 years. We have the first had County‐ run Health Maintenance Organization that is funded with Medicare reimbursements.

The county is exploring becoming part of a region‐wide health care system centered by University of San Francisco (UCSF). UCSF is in the process of buying Children’s Hospital Oakland, and is open to entering the East Bay market more comprehensively. By affiliating with UCSF in some way, Doctors’ Hospital in San Pablo could become part of this consolidation.

Supervisor Gioia pointed out that Obamacare incentivized delivering health care more efficiently, and focusing on more preventative medicine. Affordable care keeps people out of the hospital; making it easier to see primary care doctor will help people stay healthier.

Finances
The lawsuits with Chevron are over – Chevron has withdrawn one, and the panel appointed by the Assessor dismissed another. By the way, ECDC members can be proud of our member Art Walenta who served on the panel and wrote the dismissal! The County netted $8 million from the results.

201309
Supervisor Gioia addresses the club.

After two years of property tax decrease and one year no growth, there has been an increase in property tax collections. During the down times, the County worked with unions to prevent layoffs and preserve services, even as the demand went up during the recession.

When employees paid more health care and pensions, it helped meet those goals. But now we have seen a 3.5% increase from property, and are projecting a 5% increase forward.

Of course, we still have the looming unfunded pension liability of $55,600,000. So putting together the projected increases in revenue and project additional, the County is looking at a $22,980,000 deficit for 2014/15.

Good news
Save the Bay launched a project to get an SF Bay region‐wide parcel tax onto the ballot that would fund wetlands restoration and protection. With all of the Bay Area counties participating, a small amount for each parcel would provide significant funding to preserve and protect the Bay.

Contra Costa Library working on its strategic plan. The meeting in El Cerrito had the best turn out in county. There is a big citizen movement in El Cerrito to build new library.

RYSE Center in Richmond is a youth center grew out of youth’s response to the killings of four young people in 2000. Although it is a “place to hang out” and be safe from violence, there are several active programs, including music video productions. Supervisor Gioia encouraged us to take a look at rysecenter.org.
If you download it on iTunes, RYSE gets the money. But if you just want to listen, do that too.

Assembly member Nancy Skinner proposed legislation to increase penalties and fines levied against companies for things like the Chevron fire. These funds would go towards more refinery monitoring which will hopefully prevent the kinds of accidents that generated the fines in the first place.

BART Workers/Management Dispute

by Betty Brown

As of the writing (Sep. 30, 2013) BART management negotiators have rejected a compromise offered by Bart workers, and management is making extensive preparations for a strike cone October 11, 2013.

I wonder how many of our readers are aware of the August 6th Alameda Labor Council Resolution on the Dispute. There are four Whereas clauses and two Resolve clauses I’d like to call your attention to as follows:

Whereas, BART union members have been working hard days, nights and weekends for months to secure a fair contract from management thereby avoiding a work stoppage, and…

Whereas, While BART union members have shown a willingness to bargain on the important issues including worker and rider safety, pay discrimination, wages, health & welfare, and retirement, and…

Whereas, BART management has bargained in bad faith and has been missing from negotiations for much of the last 30 days and…

Whereas, BART management has hired an out‐of‐state lawyer, Thomas Hock, with a history of driving disputes to strikes as its lead negotiator, paying him $399,000 of taxpayer money, and…

Therefor be it Resolved, that the Alameda Labor Council immediately call on all parties involved in the BART dispute to reach an amicable resolution to this difficult situation which is essential to rider safety and reflects the workers need to earn a decent living, keep their families healthy and provide for a secure retirement, and finally…

Be it Resolved, that the Alameda Labor Council commits to aid and assist in facilitating a settlement at BART and will take whatever actions may be deemed necessary by the workers and management to reach an accord.

Josie Camacho, Executive Secretary‐Treasurer, signed the Resolution.

I personally see this as part of a bigger picture related to the strength of Unions in general and private compared to public workers. Private sector union membership has markedly declined in comparison to public sector workers. Unions being the antipathy of corporate right wing forces have been under attack and public workers in general are currently their target. I see it as in all of our best interest to oppose this race to the bottom!

Fresh California Laws

by Carla Hansen

Tis’ the season for new laws! Here are a noteworthy few authored by Bay Area representatives . By no means is this a full list or explaination. Check out the Governor’s website‐ http://gov.ca.gov/home.php.

  • SB 254 by Loni Hancock (D‐Berkeley): Provides consumers with options to help ensure used mattresses are deposited with recyclers, therefore alleviating landfilling and/or illegally disposed mattresses in streets and canyons. SB 254 contributes to the state’s 75% recycling goal by dramatically reducing the number of mattresses disposed in landfills while reducing the number of illegally disposed mattresses.
  • AB 484 by Susan Bonilla (D‐Concord): Establishes the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress, commencing with the 2013‐14 school year, as the statewide assessment program, aligned with the common core state standards, and provides for a rational transition from the existing statewide assessment system to the new system. In addition, the bill provides direction on the administration and future expansion of the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress to ensure a comprehensive assessment system that best meets the needs of teachers, students, and parents.
  • AB 123 by Rob Bonta (D‐Alameda): Requires the State Board of Education to ensure that the state curriculum and framework on César Chávez and the history of the farm labor movement in the United States and include information on the role of immigrants, including Filipino Americans, in that movement.
  • AB 1092 by Marc B. Levine (D‐San Rafael): Requires the California Building Standards Commission and the Department of Housing and Community Development to develop standards for electric vehicle charging infrastructure in multi‐family housing and non‐residential developments.
  • AB 551 by Philip Y. Ting (D‐San Francisco): Allows cities and counties to establish Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones, to help encourage owners of undeveloped properties to use their land for urban farming, providing communities with urban green space and a local food source.